🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.3/5 from 137+ reviews
Women βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

16MM LOGO - Belt - oxford

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.3 out of 5 (137 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$38
$63.33
Sale
βœ“ at no charge delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Fastening : Plaque bucklePattern : PlainArticle number : MK151D04O-Q11

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift dispatch

↩️
functional Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

16MM LOGO - Belt - oxford

Fastening : Plaque buckle
Pattern : Plain
Article number : MK151D04O-Q11

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Women products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1056317

Category: Women > Accessories > Belts

Original Price: $63.33 USD

Sale Price: $38 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand brand-new

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ no-cost fulfillment on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.3
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 8101 reviews
SA
Samantha Adams βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Milwaukee, WI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
treasure this 16MM LOGO - Belt - oxford!
After a few days, the 16MM LOGO - Belt - oxford feels solid and it meets expectations.
8 people found this helpful
BW
Brandon Wright βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Columbus, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
A must-have
In daily use, the 16MM LOGO - Belt - oxford is hassle-at no charge to use so it’s acceptable.
7 people found this helpful
BT
Brittany Turner βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Philadelphia, PA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
leading decision
straightforward to use 16MM LOGO - Belt - oxford. No learning curve.
46 people found this helpful
CE
Christina Evans βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Houston, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…​
genuinely impressed
Honestly, the 16MM LOGO - Belt - oxford feels solid which feels reasonable.
44 people found this helpful
AR
Aaron Roberts βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· San Diego, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
So happy with this
Personally, it works well enough and it’s fine overall.
31 people found this helpful